<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Successful Fee Based Builders Can Save Distressed Subdivisions for Developers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://exitrealestate540.com/2009/01/23/successful-fee-based-builders-can-save-distressed-subdivisions-for-developers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://exitrealestate540.com/2009/01/23/successful-fee-based-builders-can-save-distressed-subdivisions-for-developers/</link>
	<description>Providing you the information EDGE on Northwest Arkansas Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:33:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: benroberts</title>
		<link>http://exitrealestate540.com/2009/01/23/successful-fee-based-builders-can-save-distressed-subdivisions-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>benroberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exitrealestate540.com/?p=581#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the complement Joe.  Everything you said is dead on.  The premise will only work in certain markets (one of them happens to be mine) but that doesn&#039;t preclude a builder, bank, or developer from exploring the option, looking at the numbers, and deciding if it could be a fit for their area.  My point was that you must have a builder that is successful, has a proven product, and can build large numbers of homes (not just a few) because that allows them to take a smaller cut for each home, dropping the price.  The builder I am currently using and the reason for my post is building out homes and selling them at foreclosure/REO prices.  If prices are even remotely comparable, a buyer would be foolish not to buy a semi-custom new home over a foreclosure.  Thanks for the comment and I&#039;d be glad to hear any other thoughts you might have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the complement Joe.  Everything you said is dead on.  The premise will only work in certain markets (one of them happens to be mine) but that doesn&#8217;t preclude a builder, bank, or developer from exploring the option, looking at the numbers, and deciding if it could be a fit for their area.  My point was that you must have a builder that is successful, has a proven product, and can build large numbers of homes (not just a few) because that allows them to take a smaller cut for each home, dropping the price.  The builder I am currently using and the reason for my post is building out homes and selling them at foreclosure/REO prices.  If prices are even remotely comparable, a buyer would be foolish not to buy a semi-custom new home over a foreclosure.  Thanks for the comment and I&#8217;d be glad to hear any other thoughts you might have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Manausa - Tallahassee Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://exitrealestate540.com/2009/01/23/successful-fee-based-builders-can-save-distressed-subdivisions-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Manausa - Tallahassee Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exitrealestate540.com/?p=581#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Your point makes great sense if the home sells. The problem that builders and developers around the country are facing falling prices (meaning who&#039;s to say your home price of $192,500 will be obtained) and reduced transactions.

I have to respectfully disagree with your premise on a national basis, but I suspect there are a few markets where home values and transactions are steady.

In my market area, we have too much inventory and a builder trying this approach would most likely be throwing away money. Our prices have dropped below &quot;new cost&quot; and it will take time to get back to a balanced supply and demand real estate market.

By the way, I just stumbled across your blog (through a link back to mine...) and really enjoy what you are doing.

--Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point makes great sense if the home sells. The problem that builders and developers around the country are facing falling prices (meaning who&#8217;s to say your home price of $192,500 will be obtained) and reduced transactions.</p>
<p>I have to respectfully disagree with your premise on a national basis, but I suspect there are a few markets where home values and transactions are steady.</p>
<p>In my market area, we have too much inventory and a builder trying this approach would most likely be throwing away money. Our prices have dropped below &#8220;new cost&#8221; and it will take time to get back to a balanced supply and demand real estate market.</p>
<p>By the way, I just stumbled across your blog (through a link back to mine&#8230;) and really enjoy what you are doing.</p>
<p>&#8211;Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
